The 1989 Oscars remains a turning point in the life of the Academy Awards ā and it ended in legalities.
OUR BEST EVER SUBSCRIPTION OFFER!
Try three issues of Film Stories magazine ā for just £1: right here!
It’s been quite telling that, weeks after the 2023 Academy Awards, there’s not been a long tail of conversation in its aftermath. At least not for events unrelated to films. Everything Everywhere All At Once of course took the Best Picture prize, part of its seven Oscar haul, and the show itself was a good one. Well hosted by Jimmy Kimmel, it was very long – of course – but free of controversy and actually really rather fun to watch.
The actual Academy Awards show itself, though, has long been something of a hot potato for the Academy Of Motion Pictures Arts And Sciences (AMPAS), an organisation that keenly has to watch the ratings and continually tries to reinvent its annual big party.
The shadow over the attempts to rework the show though is still being cast from all the way back in 1989. That was the year that Grease producer Allan Carr fulfilled his lifelong dream of producing the show, bringing in some innovations that continue to form part of the Oscar show to this day.
Carr, after all, realised that the red carpet build up was an integral part of the event, and increased the onus on it. He also changed a bit of language. No longer would a presenter announce ‘and the winner is’. Instead, the line was changed to ‘and the Oscar goes to’, to subtlety remove the suggestion that those who didn’t take home gold were in some way losers.
Yet Carr’s single year producing the show isn’t remembered for those things. Instead, it was an eleven minute opening sequence that earned his show its place in Oscar infamy. Often referred to as the worst show in Oscar history, Carr decided to dispense with an actual host for the event, and instead began proceedings with an extensive musical showcase.
In the build up to the event, he’d also been teasing a rare appearance from a movie star, the kind who was such a big deal that they couldn’t be named. There were secret rehearsals, there were non-disclosure agreements, there was a locked down set.
Eileen Bowman was the actor at the heart of this, an unknown who’d come through an audition process to be cast as Snow White. She was at the centrepiece of a sequence that saw her walk through the auditorium as the television crew tried to follow her moves, before eventually becoming part of a duet with Rob Lowe.
It was not a career highlight for either, and the best thing I can do here is show it to you, rather than try to describe it.
The show had been widely hyped up by Carr in the build up to the event, and as Michael Schulman charts in his book Oscar Wars, the producer was initially oblivious to how hard his big opening number was tanking. It seemed that pretty much everyone else in the auditorium wasn’t. And whilst the rest of the show improved, the tone had been set by its beginning, and the poison pens were soon out. Reviews were not on the kind side.
Yet ordinarily, that would have been that. The Academy quickly decided not to hire Carr for the 1990 event, with Gilbert Cates instead recruited to oversee the first of what would be his 14 Oscar shows. Cates installed Billy Crystal as host – an inspired decision, as it would turn out – and things were a lot more conventional for many years going forward. Furthermore, the ratings for Carr’s show had also been the best in five years. If his brief had been in part to reignite interest in the Oscars show, Carr had delivered that. Just not in a way that made the Academy keen to work with him again. A line, at least, could be drawn there.
However, Hollywood wasn’t quite done with the 1989 event.
Carr’s decision to open the Awards show with Snow White was one made very early in the planning process. It took quite a search to find the actor to take the role on, and this was an idea that percolated for many months. The problem? Nobody had asked Disney’s permission to use the character.
Appreciating that there’s a copyright-free version of Snow White, the iteration that was absolutely covered by copyright laws was Disney’s. Carr was clearly bringing a version of Disney’s Snow White to the stage in his show, and the House of Mouse was not impressed. Arguably fuelled by the hostile response to the 1989 Oscars, a call was placed from the-then head of the studio, the late Frank Wells, to AMPAS head Richard Kahn. They had a problem. The use of Snow White had definitely not been cleared.
Schulman writes in his book that even at this stage, the likelihood is that Disney would have accepted a simple public apology from AMPAS for use of the character. Yet with no apology forthcoming, it filed legal papers in less than a week. This was potentially going to court, on the matter of trademark infringement.
Only, of course, it didn’t. The filing of formal legal documents was the catalyst for AMPAS to fast-track its own response to the issue, which was also the reason footage of the show disappeared for a while. AMPAS and Disney met up, but it still took a good week or so to hammer out an agreement, one that led to a cessation of the legalities.
The Academy thus put out a formal apology, the language of which made it very clear Disney had no involvement at all in the show’s opening number. The deal also expressly forbade the footage from ever being reused. The Academy was unable to reuse its own material, and to this date never has.
Itās taken the rise of the YouTube era to bring it back to light. In much the same way that George Lucas suppressed the infamous Star Wars Holiday Special for many years, so AMPAS was required to do the same of the 1989 Oscars show itself (or at least its opening). There was further fallout from the show, incidentally, and Schulman’s book does an excellent job of describing the subsequent letter from a bunch of Hollywood luminaries objecting to the event (Gregory Peck chief amongst them).
But at least the footage is out there now, and a bizarre chapter in the life of the Oscars can now be writtenā¦.
Lead image: BigStock
ā
Thank you for visiting! If youād like to support our attempts to make a non-clickbaity movie website:Follow Film Stories on Twitter here, and on Facebook here.Buy our Film Stories and Film Junior print magazines here.Become a Patron here.
With a slew of excellent, critically acclaimed horror films in 2024, could awards bodies finally give them more consideration? A few thoughts.
Update: These are the kinds of updates we love to write. On 5th January, something remarkable happened. Demi Moore won the Golden Globe for Best Actress in a Musical Or Comedy for her performance in [...]
Actor Warwick Davis has shared a behind-the-scenes photo from Willow, which was deleted from Disney+ last year. And he’s not very happy about it either.
Disney+ started deleting its own content in 2023. A lot of great films and TV shows were axed and aren’t available anywhere else, which feels thoroughly unfair for the people involved [...]
The nominations are in for this year’s Oscars, but they’re reflective of an industry still stuck in its old ways. Some thoughts:
You either love or hate the awards season, but it’s hard to escape it. Awards of course don’t mean everything; they’re often indicative of a great marketing campaign and the production’s address book rather [...]
Looking ahead to 2025, here are the 45 films of all genres - from horror to comedy to drama and more - we reckon you really shouldn't miss.
Special mentions:
Firstly, the movies you won’t be seeing, but want to namecheck. Our rules were that we didn’t want to include films that had screened, but not made [...]
Wicked’s road to the screen has been a long one, but has Disney been reacting to it since the musical first hit Broadway?
NB: This feature contains spoilers for Wicked Part One, Oz The Great And Powerful, and Maleficent.
Long before Wicked became a Broadway smash-hit in 2003, Disney had a history of near misses with the [...]
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.